Tag Archives: tolerance

WATCH: PragerU Asks New Yorkers if They Have Republican Friends

Will Whitt from PragerU  asked people in NYC’s Washington Square Park if they know or have any Republican friends and the answers are hilarious.

One woman responded, “NO! Thank God.”

Another said, “I wouldn’t be friends with anyone who is a Republican.” When asked why, she responded, “I don’t like that kind of extremism.”

A third woman added that you won’t find many Republicans in New York City because it’s a liberal city and you have to be open-minded to live there. She also said that because it’s such a diverse city, people can’t be bigoted or racist and live there.

One guy said he’s “literally never even met Republicans.”

Watch the rest of the responses below.

Gotta love tolerant liberals!




Tolerance from the Left: agree or else

One of the things – among the ever-growing number – the Left preaches is tolerance. They are constantly spouting on and on about the need for open mindedness, inclusiveness and listening to those with whom there may be disagreement.


Not to sound too much like our misguided friends on the Left, but tolerance is a good thing. Before you close the page, and go back to scrolling through your Facebook newsfeed, let me explain.

Listening to other viewpoints and perspectives, allowing others to live their lives as they see fit – if they aren’t bringing harm to someone else – is a good thing. Who could really argue against that? A society can’t function without some form of tolerance. Let’s face it, you’re likely not going to agree with everyone, 100 percent of the time.

Let’s remember, though, that just because I tolerate something, that doesn’t mean I agree with it. People tolerate a screaming child in a public area, but that doesn’t mean they like it. I can believe the work of Will Ferrell is complete and utter garbage, but he can still continue to churn out films, if enough people are willing to pay to watch. I can hold diametrically opposed opinions on an individual’s lifestyle, their religious and/or political beliefs and still not hate or hold any personal animosity towards that individual.

However, step out of line with the Left, present a differing opinion and watch the hateful insults fly. A few of their favorites include: racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, transphobic or just generally anything else you can attach an “ism” or “phobic” to.

Basically, the Left is using tolerance as a way to beat you into submission and if not, fine, then they will just attempt to use force to get what they want.

Check out what Leftist darling and Hollywood idiot, “comedienne” Chelsea Handler had to say about using the military to remove Pres. Trump from office.

Also, the head honchos at Google are extremely tolerant of everything….except different opinions. Google engineer James Damore was fired for stating how biological differences between men and women can lead to men and women being better suited for particular positions.

Ironically, Google’s vice president for diversity and inclusion responded to Damore’s dismissal by saying:

“Many of you have read an internal document shared by someone in our engineering organization, expressing views on the natural abilities and characteristics of different genders, as well as whether one can speak freely of these things at Google. And like many of you, I found that it advanced incorrect assumptions about gender. I’m not going to link to it here as it’s not a viewpoint that I or this company endorses, promotes or encourages.”

In a funny twist of events, some funny posters recently began showing up near Google’s office.

So again, basically when the Left says tolerance, diversity, inclusion and the alike, they mean you better be in total and complete agreement or else. Not opinions that challenge the status quo here!

Not real tolerant, huh?


Katy Perry Wants Us All to Just Love Each Other

Pop star Katy Perry is speaking out about the Manchester bombing, making an impassioned plea for everyone to just coexist. During an interview with Elvis Duran and the Morning Show, the singer called for love and unity following the ISIS attack in England. “Whatever we say behind people’s backs, the Internet can be a little bit ruthless as far as fan bases go but I think that the greatest thing we can do is just unite and love on each other,” Perry said. “No barriers, no borders, we all just need to co-exist.”

The video with the interview has since been taken down, but you can read more of Perry’s thoughts here.

Since the November election, the avid Clinton supporter has become much more vocal about politics, penning “Chained to the Rhythm” as a resistance anthem against the Trump administration. While her comments about the bombing may have been well-intentioned, they once again show how ignorant liberal Hollywood is about radical Islam.

Maybe Katy should take her “let’s all hug and love everyone” philosophy over to Iran or Afganistan and see how well that works out for her. If she tries to hug a male member of society out in the open, they’ll probably cut her arms off…or worse.

Or parade around Mosul alone in one of her concert costumes where the Islamic State makes women cover everything, even their eyes. Punishment there for not adhering to the dress code is a whipping.



Leftist celebrities want to preach love, tolerance and coexisting but fail to realize that only works if the other cultures also commit to coexisting too and in the case of ISIS, they’re only out for blood and have no interest in accepting Western culture.

And how about that wall around your mansion, Katy? Hypocrite much?


Tolerance is expected unless you’re on the left

Acceptance. Diversity. Open-mindedness.  The left enjoys throwing out these touchy-feely buzz words around as much as Planned Parenthood delights in snuffing out the next generation, which is to say a whole lot. But the big one, the word they love, the word of words for the left is “tolerance.”

And really, why would anyone object to such a word? After all, why would there be a problem with a word Merriam – Webster defines as “sympathy or indulgence for beliefs of practices differing from or conflicting with one’s own?” It sounds benign enough, unlikely to cause anyone problems. Besides, “sympathy” and “indulgence” sound like other words the left is likely to fall in love with and regurgitate with annoying regularity, too. Unfortunately, the left is generally anything but tolerant.

Don’t believe me? Fine, but for a group of people who profess to be so open-minded, accepting and tolerant, they sure do label others with rather impressive speed. Xenophobic. Homophobic. Misogynistic. Transphobic. Sexist. And their all-time favorite, racist.

Try and have a debate with a committed lefty, adamantly disagree with them on an issue like immigration, taxing “the rich,” or their fervently held belief in the power of abortion and before you know it, you’ve had one or more of those ugly labels thrown your way. See, by branding themselves as the tolerant crowd they control the debate. After all, no one can disagree with a person who is “tolerant” and if they do, then there is obviously some mental or personality defect present causing the other party to act out in such a distasteful and displeasing manner.

And that brings up another very important point about our tolerant friends on the left who regularly throw out such charged terms as “sexist” and “racist.” They always, always, always attribute motive to a position. “Whoever thinks that way is driven by their extreme hatred of gays.” “Anybody who believes in this must loathe woman.” “They just enjoy seeing old people suffer.”  Real, simple, honest debate is not possible with an individual with this line of thinking.

Using such terms and attributing motive to those on the other side of the ideological aisle is intellectually lazy, but the left does it all the time. Take for instance, the recent health care vote in the House. The amount and sheer absurdity of the politically-charged rhetoric coming from those who disagreed with the vote was truly unbelievable.

It’s much easier to call someone a politically-charged name then it is to actually exercise thought and develop a coherent and well-rounded argument for a position.

The left characterizes their opponents using language, that if used against them, would cause them to retreat to their safe spaces and caterwaul about microaggressions.  It simply ends the debate. I mean, c’mon what is someone to say when their argument is completely invalidated because they are so obviously a racist or a xenophobe?

But you’ve gotta give credit where credit is due, shutting down debate by calling oneself tolerant, giving oneself the moral high ground in any and all debate is quite impressive. A tolerant lefty wins every debate because of their innate ability to tolerate any and all opposing viewpoints, while remaining completely respectful. Yeah, right.

Let’s be truly honest with ourselves, the only thing liberals won’t tolerate, the one thing that absolutely drives them mad is dissent. And that my friends, will not be tolerated.